CVE-2024-39486

July 6, 2024, 10:15 a.m.

Received
CVE has been recently published to the CVE List and has been received by the NVD.

Products

Linux kernel

Source

416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67

Tags

CVE-2024-39486 details

Published : July 6, 2024, 10:15 a.m.
Last Modified : July 6, 2024, 10:15 a.m.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/drm_file: Fix pid refcounting race filp->pid is supposed to be a refcounted pointer; however, before this patch, drm_file_update_pid() only increments the refcount of a struct pid after storing a pointer to it in filp->pid and dropping the dev->filelist_mutex, making the following race possible: process A process B ========= ========= begin drm_file_update_pid mutex_lock(&dev->filelist_mutex) rcu_replace_pointer(filp->pid, <pid B>, 1) mutex_unlock(&dev->filelist_mutex) begin drm_file_update_pid mutex_lock(&dev->filelist_mutex) rcu_replace_pointer(filp->pid, <pid A>, 1) mutex_unlock(&dev->filelist_mutex) get_pid(<pid A>) synchronize_rcu() put_pid(<pid B>) *** pid B reaches refcount 0 and is freed here *** get_pid(<pid B>) *** UAF *** synchronize_rcu() put_pid(<pid A>) As far as I know, this race can only occur with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y because it requires RCU to detect a quiescent state in code that is not explicitly calling into the scheduler. This race leads to use-after-free of a "struct pid". It is probably somewhat hard to hit because process A has to pass through a synchronize_rcu() operation while process B is between mutex_unlock() and get_pid(). Fix it by ensuring that by the time a pointer to the current task's pid is stored in the file, an extra reference to the pid has been taken. This fix also removes the condition for synchronize_rcu(); I think that optimization is unnecessary complexity, since in that case we would usually have bailed out on the lockless check above.

CVSS Score

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Weakness

Weakness Name Description
This website uses the NVD API, but is not approved or certified by it.